Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Management of Lumbar Discogenic Pain
  • D. Scott Kreiner, MD
2
Discogenic Back Pain
  • Low back pain is the second most common reason that patients seek medical care
  • More health care dollars are spent on back pain than any other condition
  • IDD is the most common cause of low back pain, 40% of cases
  • 3-6 million patients in US with chronic back pain
  • Other causes include more severe disc injuries, posterior element pain, spinal stenosis, instability, fracture, etc
3
Lumbar Spine
  • Five vertebral bodies
  • Sacrum
  • Five intervertebral discs
  • Five lumbar nerve roots exit through the intervertebral foramen
  • Five sacral nerve roots exit through the sacral foramen
4
Intervertebral Disc
  • Nucleus pulposus
  • Anulus fibrosis
  • Vertebral end-plates
5
Nucleus  Pulposus
  • Semifluid mass with consistency similar to toothpaste
  • Contains:
  • Water
  • Collagen
  • Glycosaminoglycans
  • Proteoglycans
  • Enzymes
6
Anulus fibrosis
  • 10-20 sheets (average 17) of collagen fibers called lamellae
  • Lamellae are arranged in concentric rings surrounding the nucleus
  • Lamellae are thicker in the anterior and lateral portions, posteriorly they are finer and more tightly packed
  • Fibers of the lamallae are oriented parallel to one another and at an angle of about 65° from the vertical
  • Direction of inclination of fibers alternates between each lamellae
7
Vertebral End-plates
  • Layer of cartilage 0.6-1mm thick
  • Covers the area on the vertebral body encircled by the ring apophysis
  • Made of hyaline cartilage (near vertebral body) and fibrocartilage (near anulus)
  • Deficient subchondral bone over about 10% of the vertebral end-plate allows nutrients from the marrow to diffuse into the nucleus
8
Innervation
  • Outer 1/3 of anulus and PLL innervated by sinuvertebral nerves
  • Anterior disc has some sensory input through sympathetic trunk
  • Posterior spinal elements carry nociception through medial branch nerves
9
Dermatomes
  • May be described as numbness, an “ache”, or less commonly paresthesias
  • Dermatomes suggestive but not absolute
10
Myotomes
  • T12, L1, L2, L3
  • Iliopsoas


  • L2, L3, L4
  • Quadriceps
  • Hip adductor group


  • L4
  • Tibialis anterior
  • Knee Jerk reflex
  • L5
  • Extensor hallucis longus
  • Gluteus medius
  • Extensor digitorum longus & brevis
  • S1
  • Peroneus longus & brevis
  • Gastrocnemius-Soleus
  • Gluteus maximus
  • Ankle Jerk reflex


11
Radiculopathy
  • Weakest point of the disc is the paracentral location or the posterolateral corner
  • Disc protrusion in the paracentral location affects the descending nerve root at this level, usually not the exiting nerve root
12
Contained Disc Injuries
13
Non-contained Disc Injuries
14
Internal Disc Disruption
  • 40% prevelance1
  • Constant deep aching pain aggravated by any movement that mechanically stresses the disc
  • No neurological deficits
  • CT scans and myelography frequently normal
  • Diagnostic criteria:
    • Disc stimulation must reproduce the patients pain, adjacent discs non-painful
    • Post-discography CT scan demonstrates at least a grade 3 anular fissure
  • MRI may show a HIZ on T2 images in the posterior anulus
15
MRI – Internal Disc Disruption
  • +/- desiccation
  • +/- protrusion
  • HIZ usually correlates with pain and anular tear1
16
Granulation (Neural) Ingrowth
17
Protrusions
  • Very common
  • Nuclear material protrudes through some (but not all) of the anular fibers
  • May or may not produce pain
  • Not likely to spontaneously resolve
  • May cause radicular pain and on occasion radiculopathy
  • MRI is sufficient for diagnosis but will not tell if is causing pain


18
Extrusions
  • Nuclear material has extruded through entire anulus, may or may not extend through posterior longitudinal ligament
  • More likely to cause radiculopathy
  • Usually occurs in the posterolateral corner


  • Usually affects nerve descending behind the disc (i.e. L5 nerve root for L4-5 disc)
  • Natural course is resolution
  • May require surgery if weakness profound, does not improve or if incontinence develops
19
Sequested Fragment
  • A piece of nuclear fragment separates from the rest of the extruded disc
  • Usually displaces inferiorly
  • May or may not be symptomatic (depends on location)
  • Spontaneous resolution unpredictable
20
Diagnosis
  • History
  • Examination
  • Imaging
  • Electrodiagnostic Studies
  • Provacative Discography
21
Complaints (Historic Features)
  • Most common injury involves twisting/bending to pick-up something with an outstretched arm
  • Pain in low back which commonly radiates into the gluteal area
  • Pain increases with prolonged sitting, standing, walking
  • Sitting intolerance
  • Pain increases with motions that stress the disc (bending, lifting, twisting, etc.)


  • Pain increases with coughing, sneezing, etc (result of increased intradiscal pressure)
  • Pain below knee more common of a disc protrusion/extrusion than IDD
  • Paresthesias common if dorsal root ganglia compressed
  • Cramping/ache in myotomal muscles common with protrusion/extrusion
22
Physical Examination
  • History of sciatica has a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 88% for predicting a herniated lumbar disc1
  • SLR has a sensitivity of >90% for detecting disc herniation though the specificity is low (~15%)
  • Lesague sign also predictive
  • Weakness, sensory changes and decreased reflex are diagnostic of radiculopathy though not of its cause
  • Sciatic notch tenderness
  • +/- PSIS tenderness
23
Electrodiagnostic Studies
  • Sensitivity is very low in patient’s with lumbar radicular pain; about 77% sensitive if radiculopathy present1
  • Few indications:
    • Exclusion of more distal nerve damage
    • Verification of subjective muscle weakness in patients presenting pain inhibition or lack of cooperation
    • Recurrent disc operation if difficult surgery is expected
  • A patient’s radicular pain cannot be explained by neurophysiological testing
  • Electrophysiological evaluation does not directly evaluate neurologic mechanisms associated with pain generation
  • Can not accurately determine the precise spinal nerve level
24
Radiographs
  • Shows bones only (not discs)
  • No real role in diagnosing discogenic pain or radiculopathy in young patients
  • Helpful in older patients where cause of radiculopathy more likely to be a result of degenerative foraminal stenosis
  • Generally recommended only if history is atypical (i.e. unexplained weight loss, fever or chills, intense pain at rest, pain worse at night) or if fracture is a concern
25
CT Scan
  • Preferred method for bony evaluation of spine
  • May diagnose disc pathology though sensitivity very low compared with MRI
  • Helpful in fractures or other bony abnormalities, 3D reconstruction sometimes useful
  • Role in disc pathology limited to post-discography scanning or post myelography scan
26
MRI
27
MRI
  • Order urgently if Cauda Equina Syndrome red-flag condition exists
  • If no red-flag:
    • Refrain from imaging on first visit, especially if early in course; wait until symptoms have persisted for ~6-7 wks
    • Attempt conservative management prior to MRI
    • Single level radicular weakness is not a clear indication for MRI if early
  • Need MRI if surgery or possibly epidurals considered
28
MRI
29
Provacative Discography
  • Only way to determine if a disc is causing pain
  • Need “control” levels
  • Pressures helpful
  • Not a first line diagnostic study
  • Is painful
  • Risks minimal if precautions taken
  • Controversial
30
Provacative Discography
31
Post-discography CT Scan
  • Helps identify location of injury
  • Helps identify extent of injury
  • Allows for the best anatomic evaluation of the nuclear-anular junction
32
Treatment Options
  • NSAIDs
  • COX-II Inhibitors
  • Oral Steroids
  • Muscle Relaxants
  • Narcotics
  • TENs
  • Physical Therapy
  • Epidural Steroid Injections
  • Thermal Annuloplasty
  • Percutaneous disc decompression
  • Discectomy
  • Fusion
33
NSAIDs
  • Helpful in reducing acute and sub-acute pain
  • May have therapeutic effect on decreasing epidural inflammatory response
  • COX-II inhibitors equally as effective as non-selective NSAIDs, safety profile better
  • Should be first line agent
34
Oral Steroids
  • Can help decrease epidural inflammation
  • Reserve for use in patients with severe pain
  • Systemic effects greater than for epidural steroids
  • Know safety profile
35
Muscle Relaxants
  • Gaba Agonists
  • Baclofen (lioresal)


  • Alpha2 Agonists
  • Zanaflex (tizanidine)


  • SR Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Dantrium (dantrolene)
  • CNS depressants
  • Soma (carisoprodol)
  • Robaxin (Methocarbamol)
  • Skelaxin (Metaxalone)
  • Flexeril (Cyclobenzaprine)


  • Benzodiazepines
36
Narcotics
  • Helpful for severe, acute pain
  • Lay out timeline to get patient off
  • Avoid long-term use
  • Plan for constipation, stool softeners with script
37
Physical Therapy
  • Lumbar traction does not influence outcome at 6 weeks1
  • Comprehensive physical therapy has been shown to be effective in treating chronic radicular pain2
  • Modality care can decrease acute symptoms
  • Stabilization and core strengthening programs best performed when pain controlled
  • Should be used in conjunction with other treatment modalities (oral agents, injections, etc)
38
Chiropractic Care
  • Can be effective for some types of back pain, in particular, pain from posterior elements, and musculoligamentous structures
  • Modality care can be helpful in reducing inflammation and symptoms from discogenic pain
  • No literature to support manipulative care aids in disc healing
39
Epidural Steroid Injections
  • Approaches:
  • Caudal
  • Interlaminar
  • Transforaminal


  • Blind vs Flouroscopically-guided
40
Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections
  • Effective for multilevel pathology including spinal stenosis
  • Uses most volume of any approach
  • Non-selective
  • May be performed under flouroscopic guidance or blind


41
Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections
  • May be done in office setting
  • Does not require use of flouroscopy
  • Less diagnostic, usually covers a broader area of coverage since higher volume is used
  • Solution placed in posterior epidural space
42
Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
  • More effective than interlaminar injections
  • Direct injectate to the anterior epidural space
  • Diagnostic and therapeutic
  • Lower volume of injectate
  • Much lower risk of dural puncture and associated headache
43
Flouroscopic vs Blind Injections
  • Flouroscopic guidance is the only way to ensure that solution travels to the target location
  • Flouroscopy decreases risk of complications
  • Flouroscopic guidance is more effective than blind injections
  • Flouroscopy does have risks associated with radiation exposure, though exposure is very limited
44
Minimally Invasive Intradiscal Procedures
  • Contained Disc Protrusion


  • Nucleoplasty
  • Dekompressor
  • Viking Decompression Catheter
  • IDD with Anular Tear


  • IDET
  • DiscTrode
45
IDEA - Indications
  • Pain for > 3 months
  • Other methods of treatment have failed
  • IDD with anular fissure/tear
  • Less than 50% loss of disc height
  • Provacative discography confirms pain generator


46
IDEA
  • A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intradiscal Electrothermal Anuloplasty (IDETä) for the Treatment of Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
  • Kevin Pauza, Susan Howell, Paul Dreyfuss, John Peloza, Kathryn Park, Kathryn Dawson, Nikolai Bogduk


47
Intradiscal Electrothermal Anuloplasty
48
Percutaneous Discectomy - Indications
  • Pain for > 3 months
  • Other methods of treatment have failed
  • Contained disc protrusion
  • Less than 50% loss of disc height
49
Percutaneous Discectomy
  • Lumbar discectomy (mechanical removal of the intervertebral disc nucleus pulposis) is the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedure
  • Percutaneous discectomy was developed to reduce the complications associated with open disc surgery
  • Between 1985 and 1992 eight studies have been done showing a 72-86% success rate in properly selected patients with a markedly reduce mobility and mortality as compared with open discectomy
50
Dekompressor
51
Open Discectomy
  • Indicated when a definite diagnosis of a disc extrusion with sciatica or other radicular pain exists for more than 4 to 8 weeks despite conservative care
  • More urgent if has progressive loss of motor, bladder, or bowel function or there is excruciating pain that can not be relieved by non-operative treatment
  • Delay for longer than 6 months in face of persistent and severe symptoms may compromise best results
52
Fusion
  • Rarely indicated for discogenic pain
  • Last resort treatment when all else fails
  • To be effective to treat discogenic pain, all anular material
  • Risk failure at levels surrounding fusion
53
Red Flags
  • Cancer Related Red Flags
  • History of cancer
  • Unexplained weight loss >10 kg within 6 months
  • Age over 50 years or under 17 years old
  • Failure to improve with therapy
  • Pain persists for more than 4 to 6 weeks
  • Night pain or pain at rest


  • Cauda Equina Syndrome Related Red Flags
  • Urinary incontinence or retention
  • Saddle anesthesia
  • Anal sphincter tone decreased or fecal incontinence
  • Bilateral lower extremity weakness or numbness
  • Progressive neurologic deficit


  • Infection Related Red Flags
  • Persistant fever (temperature over 100.4 F)
  • History of intravenous drug abuse
  • Recent bacterial infection
    • UTI or pyelonephritis
    • Cellulitis
    • Pneumonia
  • Immunocompromised states
    • Systemic corticosteroids
    • Organ transplant
    • Diabetes mellitus
    • HIV
    • Rest Pain


  • Acute Abdominal Aneurysm Red Flags
  • Abdominal pulsating mass
  • Atherosclerotic vascular disease
  • Pain at rest or nocturnal pain
  • Age greater than 60 years
54
Scott Kreiner, MD
  • skreiner@ahwatukeesportsandspine.com


  • Office: (480) 763-5808
  • Cell: (602) 363-6180